2014年2月10日星期一

Plastic bags are a miniscule contribut

First and foremost, the core premise of SB 270 is fundamentally at odds with reality. Plastic bags are a miniscule contributor to both the waste and litter streams. According to data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, plastic bags comprise less than 0.5 percent of municipal waste in the United States, and litter studies across the country consistently find that plastic bags are less than 1 percent of all litter. Banning them will have absolutely no meaningful effect on either the quantity of waste that our state produces, or the amount of litter on our streets or in our waterways.Previous ban bills have similarly sought to eliminate plastic bags and force customers to pay a 10-cent fee for paper bags or buy "reusable" bags - a sweet deal for big grocers who get to keep the entire fee at a sizeable profit, while eliminating overhead costs.So what makes SB 270 new and different? Well it still bans the 100 percent recyclable plastic bags that 2,We're confident that you won't find bulk Wholesale 2014 New Arrivals Dresses Online anywhere else at any lower prices.000 California workers work hard to produce, but it replaces them with plastic bags that are five times thicker. That's right. Somehow forcing people to use a much thicker plastic bag is going to be better for the environment.Another key element of this bill - and the one chief concern of Sens. de Leon and Lara that led them to oppose last year's ban bill - is that it supposedly will prevent job losses at factories like mine by providing $2 million dollars in loans or grant money to "re-tool" our operations and "re-train" our workers to make the thicker,The Western style of formal Discount Taffeta Sweetheart Crystal Beaded A-line Prom/Evening Dresses, characterized by black and white garments, has spread through many countries. more expensive plastic bags.

As someone with more than 20 years of experience in this industry, let me put this into perspective: $2 million dollars is enough money to replace half of one production line in one factory. It is a token investment at best and will do nothing to protect our industry's workers from the threat of job loss.As if the flaws outlined above weren't enough, what should really outrage California shoppers is the fact that this bill will generate even bigger profits for corporate grocery chains at the customers' expense.In addition to charging people a minimum of 10 cents per paper bag, grocery stores will now get to apply the same charge for the thicker plastic bags. This translates into tens to hundreds of millions of dollars of new revenue for grocers.SB 270 represents a true fleecing of the public, especially lower-income shoppers, under the guise of environmentalism. If this bill were actually about the environment, at least some of the bag fees might go to a public purpose - like funding recycling or litter prevention initiatives.Our industry remains open to a solutions-oriented dialogue on this issue, but SB 270 is not the answer. It's a loss for the environment, a loss for California workers, and a loss for consumers.Adcock Ingram and its Chilean suitor CFR Pharmaceuticals have agreed that the time has come to part ways.This follows this week's announcement by Bidvest that together with Community Investment Holdings it had secured 34.5% of Adcock Ingram's issued shares.From chic daytime styles to gorgeous Discount Water melon Chiffon sheath one shoulder bridesmaid dresses party dress, make a fabulous entrance this festive season – no matter the dress code.

没有评论:

发表评论